Who the Hell do you think you are!!!?

Who the Hell do you think you are? Using those two words in the same sentence!
Who the Hell do you think you are!!!? Giving our nations enemy something it did not achieve!
Who the Hell do you think you are!!? Playing commander and chief!
Who the Hell do you think you are!!? Disgracing and insulting every Man and Woman who EVER joined the armed forces to defend this country to their death if nessesary!
Who the Hell do you think you are!!? Using those two words together to defend an indefensable position!
Who the Hell do you think you are!!? calling a muslim mosque a "VICTORY MOSQUE"
Ill tell you who you are.
You are a traitor to your country, handing the extremist muslims (Not all muslims)a victory over the USA when they have won nothing.
You are a concervative elitest who has abandoned his countries constitution and showing your hypocrisy in the process.
You are a coward in the face of defeat.
The issue of a mousqe in Lower manhattan is an issue that has two very distinct sides to the arqument. Side one: 3000+ people of many different races, and religions died in a horrific terrorist act carried out by 20 muslim extremists who knocked this country down, and gave this country a bloody nose; but that is where it ends. This country has risen from the dust of the TwinTowers to defend our country where our enemies hide. Oue enemies have not been victorious, therefore logic dictates that there cannot be a "Victory mosque" yet you call the mosque of lower manhatten just that. THat makes you a traitor to your country.
The families of those who died will have there memorial at Ground Zero. This is what this country will do to remember those who lost there lives that day.
Side Two: The constitution of the United States protects religious freedom. This is not arguable. This means that the Muslims have every right to build there mosque at the site they chose two blocks from ground zero because if it were any other church, we would never have been an issue. This means that the muslims are being singled out for their religion. If you do that you have abandoned the very Constitutional rights of religious freedom this country was founded on.
You would have us believe that this is not a religious issue because the muslims can build there mosque any where they want, just not at ground zero, but that is the first lie. You continue to say the mosgue will be at ground zero, yet if you look at a map the mousqe will be built two blocks away, around the corner and in the middle of that block. This lie is a typical lie, specifically catored to do what is typical of you the conservative right when you have a position which is indefensable. You play on our emotions, and try to make the argument about something else you believe you can win. A cowards game.
The second lie, You,  the anti constititionists have come up with to try to trick us into looking away from the constitutionality of the issue, is the process of the Orthodox Church destroyed when the Twin Towers colapsed. You are trying to make us believe that the orthodox church has been prevented from rebuilding by the Port Authority while they fast track a mosque. You are trying to make us believe that the Port Authority is the one who is not supporting the constitution, therefore in the interest of fairness the mosque must not be built. Another lie. This is how I have heard the events have taken place. The Orthodox church which was destroyed in the attack, has been offered a plot of land much better than the one they currently were on, and also 60 million dollars to rebuild on said property. In addition if they do not want to move, they can build on the original site they were on at any time, they still own the property. However when the orthodox church approched the Port Authority about rebuilding on a larger sight the port authority said yes and also threw in $60 million dollars to help them rebuild. The church insisted on $80 million and also wanted decision making authority on properties around them. The Port Authority refused and the church has walked away from the table. They can still build on there original sight, but have thus far chosen not to. The original deal is also still on the table also, So this leaves the whole idea of the orthodox church a non issue.
Two sides both of equal relevance, but one is indefensable. Now you would have us believe that according to your poles, 70% of the people are against this mosque, but you do not tell us that in this same pole, as many people also said they believed the constitutional freedom of religion must be upheld. News flash, a lie of omission is still a lie.
Discussion on the issue is good, it can make our country stronger, and we all also have the constitutional right to our freedom of speech. Some just exercise this right with cowardess and shame instead of honesty and truth.
Who the Hell do you think you Are!!?